Chest
Volume 114, Issue 2, August 1998, Pages 556-562
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations In Critical Care
Does Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Ventilation Improve Left Ventricular Function?: A Comparative Study by Transesophageal Echocardiography in Cardiac and Noncardiac Patients

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.114.2.556Get rights and content

Study objectives

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been proposed to improve cardiac output in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This study was designed to compare quantitative global and regional LV performance in response to PEEP in patients with normal and poor LV function.

Design

A prospective clinical trial.

Setting

Adult medical ICU in a university hospital.

Patients

Twelve critically ill patients requiring respiratory support and divided into two groups according to baseline transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) measurements: normal LV dimensions and fractional area of contraction (FAC=61 ±5%) (n=7) and dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced FAC (21±1%) (n=5).

Measurements and results

All patients were studied when two successive levels of PEEP (best PEEP as the highest value of respiratory compliance and high PEEP as best PEEP+10 cm H2O) were applied. Global systolic LV performance and quantitative regional wall motion analysis performed by the centerline method were assessed on the TEE transgastric short-axis view. End-systolic wall stress (ESWS) was used as a reliable indication of LV afterload. PEEP reduced LV dimensions asymmetrically in both groups of patients and septolateral diameter significantly decreased without affecting global LV systolic performance. Additionally, high PEEP produced a significant impairment in septal kinetics as evidenced by the centerline method. High PEEP also decreased ESWS for all patients (—27% in normal group and −23% in cardiac group, p<0.05) without significant improvement in global systolic LV performance (FAC: +2% in normal group and +0% in cardiac group; not significant).

Conclusions

PEEP cannot be recommended routinely to improve LV performance in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy.

Section snippets

Patients

Twelve critically ill patients (mean age, 62 years) who required continuous mechanical ventilation with PEEP for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen <200 mm Hg) were studied. Respiratory failure resulted from extensive bacterial pneumonia in two cases, acute exacerbation of COPD in five cases, and cardiogenic pulmonary edema in five cases (Table 1). Patients were divided into two groups according to baseline left ventricular echocardiographic measurements:

Results

Clinical data and outcome in both groups of patients are indicated in Table 1. Baseline left ventricular two-dimensional echocardiographic data (short-axis view) in both groups are indicated in Table 2 (ZEEP column). Whereas patients in group 1 had left ventricular dimensions and FAC in a normal range, patients in group 2 had a dilated left ventricle with reduced FAC.

The best PEEP level for the whole group was 9.6±0.2 cm H2O, resulting in an average increase in pleural pressure of 3.3±0.2 mm Hg

Discussion

Changes in pleural pressure have been shown to influence left ventricular afterload. Indeed, a negative pleural pressure increases the left ventricular afterload14, 15 while a positive pleural pressure decreases it.4, 16 In the present study, the increase in pleural pressure induced by two successive levels of PEEP was slight and probably trivial in terms of afterload changes in patients with normal left ventricular function. However, it might be significant in cardiac patients because a

References (25)

  • ReichekN et al.

    Noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress: validation of the method and initial application

    Circulation

    (1982)
  • LangRM et al.

    Systemic vascular resistance: an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload

    Circulation

    (1986)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure during abdominal hyperpression: A preliminary study in healthy volunteers

      2012, Journal of Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, we did not measure either intra-abdominal or pleural pressures, so we do not know in what extent our MAST and PEEP load challenges could have influenced the pressure gradient. We previously showed that the mean increase in pleural pressure induced by a moderate PEEP was slight and probably trivial in terms of afterload changes in mechanically ventilated patients with normal left ventricular function [8]. It might, however, be significant in cardiac patients because a dilated ventricle is more sensitive to small afterload changes [14].

    • Left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities during pneumoperitoneum in children

      2003, British Journal of Anaesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      In another investigation in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure, application of PEEP of 16 cm H2O resulted in a marked reduction in systolic septal wall motion and hyperkinesia of the lateral wall.2 An explanation postulated for these findings is a non-uniform transmission of the increased intrathoracic pressure to the LV wall because of its proximity to the pleural space.3 The mechanism by which pneumoperitoneum induces regional wall motion abnormalities is most likely similar to that of PEEP.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text