Chest
Volume 119, Issue 6, June 2001, Pages 1858-1864
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations in Critical Care
The Efficacy of Postoperative Incentive Spirometry Is Influenced by the Device-Specific Imposed Work of Breathing

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.6.1858Get rights and content

Study objectives

The study evaluated the impact of the additional imposed work of breathing (WBimp) generated by two different spirometers on postoperative incentive spirometry performance in patients at high risk and moderate risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Additionally, we investigated whether maximal inspiratory pressure (Pimax) is an easy estimate of the WBimp imposed by incentive spirometers.

Design

Prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

Setting

ICU of a university hospital.

Interventions and measurements

Thirty male patients were assigned to a group at high risk for PPCs (group A; inspiratory capacity [IC], < 1.6 L) or to a group at moderate risk for PPCs (group B; IC, 1.6 to 2.5 L) after upper-abdominal, thoracic, or two-cavity surgery. On the first or second postoperative day WBimp, IC, and Pimax were recorded without spirometers (baseline) and during incentive spirometry with the Mediflo spirometer (Medimex; Hamburg, Germany) (high WBimp) and the Coach spirometer (Kendall; Neustadt, Germany) (low WBimp) using a pneumotachograph. In group A, the baseline and the ICs for both spirometers only differed slightly. In group B, the IC was significantly reduced for the Mediflo (p < 0.05), which imposed a WBimp twice as high as the Coach (p < 0.01). Pimax was significantly increased for both the Mediflo and the Coach (p < 0.01). Pimax was positively correlated with WBimp (r = 0.8).

Conclusions

Incentive spirometers differ considerably in their additional Wbimp with a potential impact on the efficacy of postoperative incentive spirometry performance. Pimax might be an easy clinical estimate for the WBimp during incentive spirometry. Incentive spirometers with low WBimp permit increased maximal sustained inspiration and, thus, enhanced incentive spirometry performance, and, therefore, it might be more suitable for use in postoperative respiratory care.

Section snippets

Patients

After the study was approved and written informed consent was obtained, 30 male patients were included in the study after undergoing elective upper-abdominal, thoracic, or two-cavity surgery. To avoid the influence of well-known, significant, gender-specific differences in functional respiratory parameters, only male patients were included in the study. Depending on postoperative inspiratory capacity (IC) and the subsequent risk for PPCs, patients were assigned to a group of patients at high

Biometric Data

In each group, 15 patients were included. Both groups were very comparable concerning mean (± SD) age (group A, 50.3 ± 14.7 years; group B, 51.7 ± 12.7 years), mean height (group A, 173 ± 6:1 cm; group B, 172 ± 3.8 cm), and mean weight (group A, 75 ± 16.0 kg; group B, 66.4 ± 8.1 kg). The observed differences were not significant (Table 1).

IC

In group A, the mean baseline IC (1.26 ± 0.18 L) and the mean ICs using the Mediflo (1.32 ± 0.45 L) or the Coach (1.29 ± 0.33 L) differed only slightly, and

Discussion

The therapeutic efficacy of incentive spirometry is controversially discussed in the literature.3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 However, manifold variables, whether patient-related (eg, age, constitution, or concomitant pulmonary disease) or care-related (eg, type of surgery, anesthesia, or analgesia), are supposed to have an impact on the efficacy of respiratory care and yielded inconsistent results. Clinical observations indicate that not every patient will benefit from respiratory care. Schwieger et

Conclusion

In conclusion, different types of incentive spirometers differ considerably in their additional WBimp in the clinical setting. These differences seem to be clinically relevant because of their impact on postoperative incentive spirometry performance. Thus, incentive spirometers with a low additional WBimp allow improved maximal sustained inspiration and therefore might be more suitable for postoperative respiratory training. Additionally, when considering the efficacy of incentive spirometry in

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are indebted to Joan Robertson-Hoehne for language assistance and copyediting the article.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (50)

  • Sustained maximal inspiration has similar effects compared to incentive spirometers

    2019, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, we may consider that VIS was the exercise that better met the principles proposed by the technique. Previous studies have shown that FIS imposed greater work of breathing than VIS (Mang and Obermayer, 1989; Weindler and Kiefer, 2001). Using artificial lungs, Mang and Obermayer (1989) compared six different incentive spirometers and observed that FIS models imposed greater work of breathing when compared with VIS models.

  • Influence of forward leaning and incentive spirometry on inspired volumes and inspiratory electromyographic activity during breathing exercises in healthy subjects

    2012, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maintaining large inflating volumes and transpulmonary pressures for several seconds are necessary to achieve alveolar recruitment since obstructed areas have longer time constants. In contrast IS involves the use of incentive spirometers which are instrumental devices that offer the additional benefit of visual feedback, in terms of flow or volume, giving the patient a measurable goal while performing the BE (Weindler and Kiefer, 2001; Agostini and Singh, 2009). Since 1980’s, IS became widely used in the postoperative of thoracic and abdominal surgeries for the prevention and treatment of pulmonary complications (O’Donohue, 1985).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was financed entirely by university scientific budgets.

View full text