Chest
Volume 94, Issue 2, August 1988, Pages 232-238
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Comparison of Standard Weaning Parameters and the Mechanical Work of Breathing in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.94.2.232Get rights and content

Standard bedside criteria of respiratory mechanical capability and the mechanical work of spontaneous breathing were measured in 17 mechanically ventilated patients. Eleven patients were extubated within 24 hs of study and required only a brief period of mechanical ventilation (group 1). Group 2 consisted of six patients requiring more prolonged ventilator support. Group 1 patients met three of four bedside criteria; seven patients met all four. Five of six patients in group 2 also satisfied three of four standard criteria while ventilator-dependent, whereas only two patients satisfied all four when successfully weaning. As group 2 patients progressed from unsuccessful to successful weaning there was no consistent improvement in bedside criteria; however, measures of work did significantly improve. Hence, satisfaction of bedside mechanical weaning criteria is associated with weaning success in patients requiring brief mechanical ventilation. In patients requiring prolonged ventilation, work may be a better indicator of successful weaning.

Section snippets

METHODS

We studied 17 general medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients at the Tucson Veterans Administration Medical Center. All patients required intubation and mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure due to pulmonary parenchymal disease. Patients entered the study when they were medically stable with correction of hemodynamic instability, anemia, sepsis, acid/base and electrolyte abnormalities, and altered mental status and when oxygenation was adequate (arterial oxygen pressure

RESULTS

The 17 patients studied ranged in age from 51 to 78 years (mean: 65 years). They were grouped as follows (Table 1): Group 1 included 11 patients who were successfully extubated within 24 hs of study entry and were generally ventilated for a brief time period (range: 22 to 72 hs; mean: 45 hs). Group 2 included six patients who required mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hs from study entry and were studied on several occasions until successful extubation or death (one case). Time from

DISCUSSION

Our results confirm that satisfaction of conventional mechanical weaning criteria is often associated with weaning success in those patients requiring short periods of mechanical ventilation. However, in our patients requiring prolonged mechanical support, these criteria do not clearly distinguish times of ventilator dependence from those of successful weaning and extubation. The inspiratory work of spontaneous breathing is a better indicator of successful weaning.

Conventional mechanical

REFERENCES (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Supported by the Veterans Administration.

Manuscript received September 14; revision accepted January 21.

View full text