Chest
Clinical InvestigationsImportance of Evaporative Water Losses During Standardized Nebulized Inhalation Provocation Tests
Section snippets
Nebulizers
Four Wright nebulizers and one DeVilbiss 40 nebulizer were employed in this investigation. Two Wright nebulizers were those routinely used in the laboratory for a histamine/methacholine inhalation test or for allergen inhalation tests, and two were “spares.” With exception of the hand-held squeeze bulb DeVilbiss 40 trials, the nebulizers (including the DeVilbiss) were run with compressed dry medical air at 50 psi with the flow rate set at 8 L/min.
Temperature Change
Temperature change was measured with three
RESULTS
Changes in temperature over 10 min are shown in Figure 1. The mean temperature fell from 24.5° to 13.5°C, the majority occurring in the first 2 min.
The weight loss for various periods of nebulization and volumes is shown for the Wright nebulizer 1 in Figure 2 and for all five nebulizers in Table 1. For all nebulizers, the mean weight loss per minute fell markedly with increasing nebulization time. The volume (3 vs 5 ml) did not alter the weight loss. For the Wright nebulizers, the mean output
DISCUSSION
These data document and quantitate evaporation-related events during the operation of Wright nebulizers in the fashion that they are used for inhalation provocation tests. A temperature drop of 12°C occurred chiefly in the first 2 min. This is due to the latent heat of vaporization, ie, the amount of energy (lost) in the form of heat required to convert water from liquid to vapor. A progressive reduction in the amount of weight loss produced by the nebulization occurred over time; again, this
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors wish to thank Mr. J. Mink and Mrs. J. Bramley for their assistance in preparing the manuscript.
REFERENCES (9)
- et al.
Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(1975) - et al.
Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size and method of inhalation
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(1981) - et al.
Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey
Clin Allergy
(1977) - et al.
Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness
Thorax
(1983)
Cited by (49)
Strategies for pulmonary delivery of drugs
2019, Drug Delivery SystemsComparative study of the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of reduning injection and atomization inhalation
2019, Biomedicine and PharmacotherapyCitation Excerpt :More importantly, using inhalation administration, the concentration of the drug entering the systemic blood circulation is greatly reduced, which could prevent the serious adverse reactions caused by i.v. injection [5–8]. Nebulized inhalation therapy is the administration route recommended by the World Health Organization for respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [9,10]. Nebulized inhalable liquid formulations have been incorporated in the official Chinese Pharmacopoeia, 2015 Edition [11].
Realising the potential of various inhaled airway challenge agents through improved delivery to the lungs
2018, Pulmonary Pharmacology and TherapeuticsCitation Excerpt :Importantly, evaporative water losses lead to an overestimation of the administered dose when the output rate is measured gravimetrically [6]. Evaporation is an endothermic effect and the energy needed for this process is drawn from the solution, resulting in a temperature drop in the nebuliser solution that in turn may affect the output rate of the nebuliser [72]. Calibration of the nebuliser output rate should therefore be performed under precise operating conditions.
Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Measurement and Clinical Relevance
2017, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In PracticeCitation Excerpt :Traditional jet nebulizers (Wright, de Vilbiss) used for bronchoprovocation are inefficient and becoming difficult to obtain. Much of the weight loss (up to 75% or more) during use, the conventional manner in which we have determined output, is evaporation rather than nebulization.30 Because the response to methacholine is dose rather than concentration dependent,31,32 it is important to standardize methods to ensure that they deliver the same dose at a given PC20.
Manuscript received November 2; revision accepted January 23.