Chest
Clinical InvestigationsCrackles in Patients with Fibrosing Alveolitis, Bronchiectasis, COPD, and Heart Failure
Section snippets
PATIENTS
We have studied 40 patients, of which 29 were men, with 4 different diseases with crackling lung sounds detected by ordinary lung auscultation: CFA (n = 10), BE (n = 10), COPD (n = 10), and HF (n = 10), in each. Their mean age (mean ± SD) was 56 ± 8 years. The lung function studies and anthropometric data on the patients, grouped according to the diagnoses, are presented in Table 1. The Spirometric values were examined on the day of the sound recordings.
The diagnosis of the patients with CFA
METHODS
The lung sound recordings were performed in an acoustically isolated chamber with the patient in the sitting position. The patients were asked to breathe deep, slow inspirations and expirations with a peak flow of about 1 L/s. Air flow from the mouth was recorded with a pneumotachograph with the nose closed. The sounds were recorded with two microphones (with a response range from 4 Hz to 20 kHz), one for each lung. The microphones were encased in plastic supports forming a standard air space
RESULTS
The results of sound spectral analysis and phonopneumographic measurements from inspiratory breathing cycles are presented in Table 2. The frequency of maximum intensity in inspiration was the highest in patients with CFA (210 ± 90 Hz), but there were no significant differences among the patient groups. The upper frequency limit at the intensity level of −20 dB was significantly higher in patients with CFA (550 ± 110 Hz) than in patients with COPD (p<0.005) or HF (p<0.001). The peak flow of
DISCUSSION
The aim of this study was to investigate the waveform and timing of crackling sounds in four common diseases with different pulmonary pathophysiologic findings. Therefore, patients with clearly audible crackles by ordinary auscultation were selected. We did not intend to study the prevalence of crackles among the patients with the four diagnoses studied. In the patient selection, other simultaneous pulmonary diseases were excluded, and internationally accepted diagnostic criteria were followed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to Kari Kallio, B.Sc.(Eng.), Pekka Karp, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), Mika Raivio, B.Sc.(Eng.), Tony Rosqvist, M.Sc.(Eng.) and Hannu Seitsonen M.Sc.(Eng.), for their collaboration and useful discussions. The help of Ossi Korhola, M.D., in evaluating the x-ray findings and of Professor Seppo Sama and Ritva Luukkonen, Dr. Sc., for guidance in statistical problems is appreciated.
References (0)
Cited by (93)
Instantaneous frequency based index to characterize respiratory crackles
2018, Computers in Biology and MedicinePulmonary crackles, what does the clinician hear?
2015, Revue des Maladies RespiratoiresHistory and Physical Examination
2015, Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine: Volume 1,2, Sixth EditionIdentification of Velcro rales based on Hilbert-Huang transform
2014, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsCharacterization of crackles from patients with fibrosis, heart failure and pneumonia
2013, Medical Engineering and PhysicsCitation Excerpt :Processing the crackles with a 150 Hz HPFCF and analyzing them with DPWD and MGM (Table 4), it was found that the maximum frequency of fibrosis crackles was superior to the ones found in heart failure and pneumonia. However, the maximum frequency estimated in this work was almost twice that obtained by Piirilä et al. [12,13]. The heart failure crackles were also found to have the lowest maximum frequency.
Comprehensive Analysis System for Automated Respiratory Cycle Segmentation and Crackle Peak Detection
2022, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
This study was supported by grants from the Finnish Association
Against Tuberculosis and the Paulo Foundation.
Manuscript received August 2; revision accepted November 12.