Abstract
We recently demonstrated that, contrary to previous findings, some types of irrelevant motion are capable of capturing our attention (Franconeri & Simons, 2003). Strikingly, whereassimulated looming (a dynamic increase in object size) captured attention,simulated receding (a decrease in object size) did not. Abrams and Christ (2003, 2005) have provided a different interpretation of this evidence, arguing that in each case attention was captured by the onset of motion rather than by motion per se. They argued that the only published finding inconsistent with their motion onset account is our evidence that simulated receding motion failed to capture attention. Abrams and Christ (2005) presented a receding object stereoscopically and found that it did capture attention, leading them to conclude that the motion onset account explains existing data more parsimoniously than our account does. Our reply has three parts. First, we argue that evidence of capture by receding motion is interesting but irrelevant to the debate over whether capture by motion requires a motion onset. Second, we show that the original empirical evidence in support of the motion onset claim (Abrams & Christ, 2003) put the motion-only condition at a critical disadvantage. We present a new experiment that demonstrates strong capture by motion in the absence of a motion onset, showing that motion onsets are not necessary for attention capture by dynamic events. Finally, we outline what is known about the set of dynamic events that capture attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention.Psychological Science,14, 427–432.
Abrams, R. A., &Christ, S. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003).Perception & Psychophysics,67, 219–223.
Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W., &Heywood, C. A. (2005). Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation.Psychological Science,16, 270–274.
Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di Lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., &Yantis, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1287–1302.
Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A., & Bemis, D. K. (2005, May).It takes attention to capture attention. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Franconeri, S. L., Hollingworth, A., &Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention?Psychological Science,16, 275–281.
Franconeri, S. L., &Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 999–1010.
Martin-Emerson, R., &Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 739–751.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 567–571.
Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Posner, M., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance XI: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Proulx, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (2002, November).Does task difficulty modulate stimulus-driven attentional prioritization in visual search? Paper presented at the 7th Annual Object Perception, Attention, and Memory Meeting, Kansas City, MO.
von Mühlenen, A., & Lleras, A. (2003, November).Looming motion with random dot patterns attracts attention. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC.
von Mühlenen, A., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. T. (in press). Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture.Psychological Science.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
S.L.F. was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship and a Killam Postdoctoral Fellowship. D.J.S. was supported by NIH Grant R01 MH63773.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franconeri, S.L., Simons, D.J. The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005). Perception & Psychophysics 67, 962–966 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193623
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193623