Abstract
Franconeri & Simons (2003) reported that some but not all types of motion capture attention in a visual search task, ostensibly because some types of motion are behaviorally significant. In the present article, we argue that a more parsimonious explanation of their results is that the onset of motion, but not motion per se, captures attention. This conclusion helps to resolve inconsistencies between the Franconeri and Simons findings and earlier reports from other investigators and is consistent with results that we have recently reported (Abrams & Christ, 2003). The Franconeri and Simons interpretation rests largely on their failure to find attentional capture by one type of motion—simulated receding motion. We report here the results of two experiments that demonstrate that the onset of receding motion does indeed capture attention when the motion is produced using stereo depth cues. As we have argued elsewhere, the capture of attention in displays containing motion appears to be dependent on the onset of the motion, rather than on the mere presence of specific types of motion as suggested by Franconeri and Simons. One possible explanation is that the onset of motion captures attention because it serves as a strong cue to animacy—and the detection of nearby animals can have important consequences for survival.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention.Psychological Science,14, 427–432.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Franconeri, S. L., &Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 999–1010.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Kustov, A. A., &Robinson, D. L. (1996). Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements.Nature,384, 74–77.
Masson, G. S., &Stone, L. S. (2002). From following edges to pursuing objects.Journal of Neurophysiology,88, 2869–2873.
Rauschenberger, R. (2003). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 600–615.
Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., &Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 475–491.
Sugihara, H., Murakami, I., Shenoy, K. V., Andersen, R. A., &Komatsu, H. (2002). Response of MSTd neurons to simulated 3D orientation of rotating planes.Journal of Neurophysiology,87, 273–285.
Theeuwes, J., &Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 764–770.
Torriente, I., Valdes-Sosa, M., Ramirez, D., &Bobes, M. A. (1999). Visual evoked potentials related to motion-onset are modulated by attention.Vision Research,39, 4122–4139.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported here was supported by Grant BCS-0079594 from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abrams, R.A., Christ, S.E. The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003). Perception & Psychophysics 67, 219–223 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206486
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206486