Efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for maintenance treatment of persistent asthma

Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 May;77(5):437-45.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term effects of an inhaled corticosteroid with those of a leukotriene modifier on measures of clinical efficacy, subject preference, and safety in patients with persistent asthma.

Patients and methods: Between November 17, 1998, and May 26, 2000, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of patients aged 15 years or older with persistent asthma. The patients were symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone and were treated with fluticasone propionate (88 microg [2 puffs of 44 microg] twice daily) or montelukast (10 mg/d) for 24 weeks. Measures of pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, physician assessments of efficacy, patient satisfaction, asthma-related quality of life, and safety were evaluated.

Results: A total of 522 patients were randomized to receive fluticasone or montelukast, and 395 patients completed the study. At end point, treatment with fluticasone significantly improved pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores, the percentage of symptom-free days, rescue albuterol use, and the number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma when compared with montelukast (P< or = .002, each comparison). Significantly more patients were satisfied with fluticasone therapy (83%) compared with montelukast therapy (66%) (P<.001), and fluticasone therapy was rated as effective by a significantly greater portion of physicians (67%) than was montelukast therapy (54%) (P<.001). Treatment with fluticasone significantly improved asthma-related quality-of-life measures compared with montelukast (P< or =.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was similar in the fluticasone (19 patients, 7%) and montelukast (21 patients, 8%) treatment groups, although slightly more patients in the montelukast group were withdrawn from the study because of asthma exacerbations (6% vs 4%, respectively).

Conclusion: Long-term treatment with a low dose of inhaled fluticasone is more effective than oral montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy for the treatment of persistent asthma.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acetates / administration & dosage*
  • Acetates / adverse effects
  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Androstadienes / administration & dosage*
  • Androstadienes / adverse effects
  • Anti-Allergic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Allergic Agents / adverse effects
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / adverse effects
  • Asthma / drug therapy*
  • Bronchodilator Agents / administration & dosage
  • Bronchodilator Agents / adverse effects
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cyclopropanes
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Fluticasone
  • Headache / etiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nebulizers and Vaporizers
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Quality of Life
  • Quinolines / administration & dosage*
  • Quinolines / adverse effects
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / etiology
  • Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders / etiology
  • Sulfides
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Acetates
  • Androstadienes
  • Anti-Allergic Agents
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Cyclopropanes
  • Quinolines
  • Sulfides
  • Fluticasone
  • montelukast