Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and high-frequency jet ventilation in cats with normal lungs

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1989;7(1):35-41. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950070109.

Abstract

Four adult cats received alternating high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) at equivalent proximal airway pressures. Physiologic measurements were made before and after each ventilator change. Proximal airway pressures were then adjusted as necessary to reestablish normal pH and PaCO2 values. Aortic, pulmonary artery, and central venous pressures were monitored. Cardiac outputs were measured. Pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance, intrapulmonary shunt, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient were determined. Following the change from HFOV to HFJV at similar proximal airway pressures, HFJV always produced higher pH values (P less than 0.0001), higher PaO2 values (P less than 0.05), lower PaCO2 values (P less than 0.0001), as well as higher cardiac outputs (P less than 0.01), lower pulmonary artery pressures (P less than 0.001), and lower pulmonary vascular resistances (P less than 0.001). Following the reciprocal crossover, from HFJV to HFOV, HFJV pH values were again higher (P less than 0.001), and PaCO2 values were again lower (P less than 0.001). A comparison of HFOV and HFJV at similar pH and PaCO2 values showed that HFOV consistently required higher peak inspiratory pressures (P less than 0.001), higher mean airway pressure (P less than 0.001), and higher pressure wave amplitudes (P less than 0.001). Under the circumstances of this study, HFJV produced better gas exchange at lower proximal airway pressures.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Airway Resistance
  • Animals
  • Blood Pressure
  • Cardiac Output
  • Cats
  • High-Frequency Jet Ventilation*
  • High-Frequency Ventilation*
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Respiration*
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Vascular Resistance