ReplyCorrespondence

Promoting the Inclusion of Lung Volumes in the Reversibility Evaluation—Reply

Conor T McCartney, Gregg L Ruppel and Ravi P Nayak
Respiratory Care February 2017, 62 (2) 256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05411

In reply:

We greatly appreciate the thoughts Dr Ben Saad has shared with us about hyperinflation and our research. We think his research on lung volume reversibility1 complements ours.2 The question of whether residual volume change was more sensitive than FEV1 or FVC change is a problematic one because all thresholds for responsiveness are arbitrary and can be manipulated by setting them higher or lower. What we found was that residual volume change correlated poorly with FEV1 and FVC, which led us to conclude that we were describing a novel group of responders.

The research of Dr Ben Saad1 shows that there were more residual volume responders in the hyperinflated group but not the control, which suggests that there are probably differences between hyperinflated people and those that are not hyperinflated. This makes us wonder whether we should use obstructed patients to help guide us to what expected change is and not use healthy subjects.3

Ultimately, we think the more we expand our knowledge about lung volumes the better off we will be understanding obstructive lung diseases. We think residual volume changes add important information about obstructive lung diseases.

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    1. Ben Saad H,
    2. Ben Amor L,
    3. Ben Mdalla S,
    4. Ghannouchi I,
    5. Ben Essghair M,
    6. Sfaxi R,
    7. et al
    . [The importance of lung volumes in the investigation of heavy smokers]. Rev Mal Respir 2014;31(1):29–40.
  2. 2.
    1. McCartney CT,
    2. Weis MN,
    3. Ruppel GL,
    4. Nayak RP
    . Residual volume and total lung capacity to assess reversibility in obstructive lung disease. Respir Care 2016;61(11):1505–1512.
  3. 3.
    1. Ben Saad H,
    2. Ben Attia Saafi R,
    3. Rouatbi S,
    4. Ben Mdella S,
    5. Garrouche A,
    6. Hadj Mtir A,
    7. et al
    . [Which definition to use when defining reversibility of airway obstruction?]. Rev Mal Respir 2007;24(9):1107–1115.