Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

Improved Endotracheal Tubes for Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Better Than Silver and Gold?

Anahita Rouzé, Ignacio Martin-Loeches and Saad Nseir
Respiratory Care January 2019, 64 (1) 108-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06698
Anahita Rouzé
University Hospital of Lille Lille Inflammation Research International Center CHU Lille Critical Care Center Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ignacio Martin-Loeches
Department of Clinical Medicine Trinity College, St James Hospital Dublin, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saad Nseir
University Hospital of Lille Lille Inflammation Research International Center CHU Lille Critical Care Center Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]

Recently, the use of noninvasive ventilation and nasal high-flow oxygen has increased, resulting in a substantial decrease in the number of intubated critically ill patients. However, a large proportion of mechanically ventilated patients still require invasive ventilation and are exposed to complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).1 Recent advances in pathophysiology and prevention of VAP have resulted in important reductions in its incidence, but the incidence of this infection is still high, especially in patients who receive prolonged mechanical ventilation.2 VAP is associated with a high mortality rate, prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU length of stay, and higher costs.3

Microaspiration of either gastric contents or oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism responsible for the entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated patients. When the quantity of aspirated bacteria is high, tracheobronchial colonization may progress into ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and VAP. In addition to factors related to the endotracheal tube (ETT), risk factors for microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients include conditions related to enteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation, and patient comorbidities.4

Biofilm formation on the ETT also plays an in important role in the pathogenesis of lower respiratory tract infections.5 Biofilms develop rapidly after an ETT is placed and represent a persistent source of bacteria in intubated critically ill patients. The volume of biofilm increases with the duration of intubation. Invasive procedures such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy and ETT suctioning may fragment some parts of the biofilm, which can progress into the distal respiratory tract with the inspiratory flow.6 Previous studies have clearly demonstrated the presence of bacteria responsible for VAP in ETT biofilm.7 However, it is still difficult to identify whether the biofilm was the source of these bacteria, or if their presence in the biofilm is an independent phenomenon. Biofilm has also been reported to be a source for recurrent VAP, especially episodes related to multidrug-resistant bacteria.6

Better understanding of VAP pathophysiology is a key component to improving preventive strategies, and important progress has been made in the prevention of microaspiration and biofilm in intubated critically ill patients.8 Regarding microaspiration, subglottic secretion drainage, continuous control of ETT cuff pressure, polyurethane-cuffed ETTs, and conical-shaped ETT cuffs are the primary measures investigated during the last decade. Encouraging results have been obtained on the role of subglottic secretion drainage and continuous control of cuff pressure on VAP incidence.9,10 However, conical ETT cuffs have shown no significant impact on microaspiration or VAP incidence,11 and interest in using polyurethane-cuffed ETTs requires further investigation.12

Few clinical studies have evaluated the impact of strategies aimed at preventing or removing biofilm in intubated critically ill patients. The large, randomized, controlled, multi-center NASCENT study13 aimed to evaluate the impact of silver-coated ETTs compared with uncoated ETTs on VAP incidence. The use of silver-coated ETTs significantly reduced the incidence of VAP and time to VAP occurrence. However, the beneficial effect was only observed during the first 10 d of mechanical ventilation. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis did not confirm these results, and the authors reported that silver-coated ETTs had no significant impact on VAP incidence.14 Berra and colleagues15 performed a single-center, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the impact of the Mucus Shaver, a device designed to remove secretions from the ETT, on biofilm formation and colonization. Although biofilm volume and rate of colonization were significantly lower in intervention group, no significant difference was found in VAP rate or other subject outcomes.

In this issue of Respiratory Care, Pirrone and colleagues16 report the results of a randomized, controlled, single-center study that aimed to evaluate the combined effect of silver-coated ETTs and cleaning of the ETT with an expandable wiper similar to the Mucus Shaver on the incidence of colonized ETTs. Thirty-nine subjects were randomized to receive the combined intervention or only silver-coated ETTs (19 subjects received the intervention, and 20 subjects served as controls). No significant difference was found in the percentage of positive ETT cultures or in bacterial load. Decreased biofilm deposition was observed in the intervention group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The authors should be congratulated for having designed and conducted this interesting study evaluating a novel concept. In fact, one of the explanations suggested for the absence of a prolonged effect of the silver coating in the NASCENT study13 was that the formation of biofilm might have prevented the silver from eradicating bacteria. Thus, it is logical to combine the 2 measures as in the study by Pirrone and colleagues.16 As clearly acknowledged by the authors, the absence of a statistically significant impact of the combined intervention could be related to the small number of subjects studied. Another explanation could be the fact that only biofilm prevention was targeted in this study, and no specific measures were used to reduce microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions. As previously highlighted, the use of bundles gathering several preventive measures aiming at preventing microaspiration and biofilm should be evaluated.17

In addition to removing biofilm or preventing its development through the use of silver-coated ETTs, another interesting perspective regarding biofilm prevention is the modulation of host response.18 Quorum-sensing inhibition or quenching, augmentation of host response, inhibition of cyclic diguanosine monophosphate, or antibiofilm peptides and molecules are being investigated to prevent biofilm formation.19 In a pilot experimental study, a single dose of poly-l-lysine K was able to immediately disrupt the biofilm structure and kill > 90% of bacteria present in the biofilm in ETTs coming from intubated critically ill patients. Future research in this field is clearly warranted in intubated critically ill patients.20 Large randomized controlled studies should also be performed to determine whether the combination of silver-coated ETTs and devices such as the Mucus Shaver are better than silver and gold for VAP prevention.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Saad Nseir, Centre de Réanimation, Hôpital Salengro, CHRU Lille, 59037 Lille, France. E-mail: s-nseir{at}chru-lille.fr.
  • Dr Nseir has disclosed a relationship with MSD International. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 1

  • Copyright © 2019 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.
    1. Rouzé A,
    2. Jaillette E,
    3. Poissy J,
    4. Préau S,
    5. Nseir S
    . Tracheal tube design and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care 2017;62(10):1316–1323.
  2. 2.
    1. Martin-Loeches I,
    2. Povoa P,
    3. Rodríguez A,
    4. Curcio D,
    5. Suarez D,
    6. Mira PJ,
    7. et al
    . Incidence and prognosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (TAVeM): a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2015;3(11):859–868.
  3. 3.
    1. Nair GB,
    2. Niederman MS
    . Ventilator-associated pneumonia: present understanding and ongoing debates. Intensive Care Med 2014;41(3):34–48.
  4. 4.
    1. Nseir S,
    2. Zerimech F,
    3. Jaillette E,
    4. Artru F,
    5. Balduyck M
    . Microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients: diagnosis and prevention. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2011;11(4):413–423.
  5. 5.
    1. Pinciroli R,
    2. Mietto C,
    3. Piriyapatsom A,
    4. Chenelle CT,
    5. Thomas JG,
    6. Pirrone M,
    7. et al
    . Endotracheal tubes cleaned with a novel mechanism for secretion removal: a randomized controlled clinical study. Respir Care 2016;61(11):1431–1439.
  6. 6.
    1. Fernández-Barat L,
    2. Torres A
    . Biofilms in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Future Microbiology 2016;12(11):1599–1610.
  7. 7.
    1. Adair CG,
    2. Gorman SP,
    3. Feron BM,
    4. Byers LM,
    5. Jones DS,
    6. Goldsmith CE,
    7. et al
    . Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 1999;25(10):1072–1076.
  8. 8.
    1. Chenelle CT,
    2. Itagaki T,
    3. Fisher DF,
    4. Berra L,
    5. Kacmarek RM
    . Performance of the PneuX system: a bench study comparison with 4 other endotracheal tube cuffs. Respir Care 2017;62(1):102–112.
  9. 9.
    1. Mao Z,
    2. Gao L,
    3. Wang G,
    4. Liu C,
    5. Zhao Y,
    6. Gu W,
    7. et al
    . Subglottic secretion suction for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Crit Care 2016;28:20(1):353.
  10. 10.
    1. Nseir S,
    2. Rodriguez A,
    3. Saludes P,
    4. De Jonckheere J,
    5. Valles J,
    6. Artigas A,
    7. et al
    . Efficiency of a mechanical device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in intubated critically ill patients: a randomized controlled study. Ann Intensive Care 2015;5(1):54.
  11. 11.
    1. Jaillette E,
    2. Girault C,
    3. Brunin G,
    4. Zerimech F,
    5. Behal H,
    6. Chiche A,
    7. et al
    . Impact of tapered-cuff tracheal tube on microaspiration of gastric contents in intubated critically ill patients: a multicenter cluster-randomized cross-over controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2017;43(11):1562–1571.
  12. 12.
    1. Blot SI,
    2. Rello J,
    3. Koulenti D
    . The value of polyurethane-cuffed endotracheal tubes to reduce microaspiration and intubation-related pneumonia: a systematic review of laboratory and clinical studies. Crit Care 2016;24:20(1):203.
  13. 13.
    1. Kollef MH,
    2. Afessa B,
    3. Anzueto A,
    4. Veremakis C,
    5. Kerr KM,
    6. Margolis BD,
    7. et al
    . Silver-coated endotracheal tubes and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: the NASCENT randomized trial. JAMA 2008;300(7):805–813.
  14. 14.
    1. Tokmaji G,
    2. Vermeulen H,
    3. Müller MC,
    4. Kwakman PH,
    5. Schultz MJ,
    6. Zaat SA
    . Silver-coated endotracheal tubes for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD009201.
  15. 15.
    1. Berra L,
    2. Coppadoro A,
    3. Bittner EA,
    4. Kolobow T,
    5. Laquerriere P,
    6. Pohlmann JR,
    7. et al
    . A clinical assessment of the Mucus Shaver: a device to keep the endotracheal tube free from secretions. Crit Care Med 2012;40(1):119–124.
  16. 16.
    1. Pirrone M,
    2. Imber DA Marrazo F,
    3. Pinciroli R,
    4. Zhang C,
    5. Bry L,
    6. et al
    . Silver-coated endotracheal tubes cleaned with a mechanism for secretion removal: a randomized controlled clinical study. Respir Care 2019;64(1):1–9.
  17. 17.
    1. Branson RD,
    2. Hess DR
    . Lost in translation: failure of tracheal tube modifications to impact ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191(6):606–608.
  18. 18.
    1. Blasi F,
    2. Page C,
    3. Rossolini GM,
    4. Pallecchi L,
    5. Matera MG,
    6. Rogliani P,
    7. et al
    . The effect of N-acetylcysteine on biofilms: Implications for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Respir Med 2016;117(2):190–197.
  19. 19.
    1. Maurice NM,
    2. Bedi B,
    3. Sadikot RT
    . Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: host response and clinical implications in lung infections. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2018;58(4):428–439.
  20. 20.
    1. Guillon A,
    2. Fouquenet D,
    3. Morello E,
    4. Henry C,
    5. Georgeault S,
    6. Si-Tahar M,
    7. Hervé V
    . Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm present in endotracheal tubes by poly-L-lysine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018;62(11):e00564.

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire