In Reply:
We thank Dr Martí and his colleagues for their comments on our study. The different methods used to investigate the clinical and physiological repercussions of airway clearance techniques make comparison between studies difficult. Animal studies like those from Unoki et al1,2 and Martí et al3 are important to elucidate mechanisms and raise insights into safety and efficacy of clinical studies with human participants. However, compared with animal models, most mechanically ventilated patients are not paralyzed and present with diverse clinical conditions and respiratory mechanics profiles.
The rational of chest physiotherapy is to displace secretions from the periphery to more central airways, where they can be removed by coughing.4 In our study, similar to the forced expiratory technique, we used prolonged strong manual compression aimed at improving the 2-phase gas-liquid flow in lung periphery.4,5 Our results showed that, according to expiratory flow-volume loop monitoring, this maneuver increased not only the peak expiratory flow but also the air flow throughout the entire expiratory phase in most subjects.6 Conversely, because the brief strong expiratory maneuver in the study by Martí et al3 increased the peak expiratory flow, it was considered an exogenous cough.7 Moreover, the increase in mucus displacement velocity in the central airways (trachea) observed in their study is an expected result and does not reflect mobilization of secretions from the lung periphery.
In conceptual terms, a distinction has to be made between any abrupt expiratory manual compressive maneuver, which mimics the attributes of an effective spontaneous cough, and prolonged expiratory rib cage compression as a technique to remove secretions from the lung periphery. The first, also called directed cough or manually assisted cough, consists of “assisting the cough effort with abdominal or thoracic compression during exhalation”4 and has been indicated to improve the peak expiratory flow in patients with weak cough.8,9 Because the hard manual rib cage compressions in the study by Martí et al3 were applied only in the early expiratory phase, we question whether it can be compared with a directed cough maneuver or an exogenous cough.
To date, the literature has not shown any benefit in mobilizing peripheral secretions by rapidly squeezing out air with prolonged strong compressions (manually assisted cough), brief strong manual compressions synchronized with the early expiratory phase (hard manual rib cage compressions), or prolonged strong and slow manual compressions throughout the entire expiration phase (expiratory rib cage compression) in mechanically ventilated patients.
Footnotes
The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
- Copyright © 2014 by Daedalus Enterprises