EditorialEditor's Choice
A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Rescue Strategies in 1,000 Subjects With Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Pablo Moreno Franco, Felicity Enders, Gregory Wilson, Ognjen Gajic and Sonal R Pannu
Respiratory Care February 2016, 61 (2) 127-133; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04162
Pablo Moreno Franco
Departments of Transplant and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
METRIC (Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care), Emergency and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
MDFelicity Enders
Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
PhDGregory Wilson
Respiratory Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
RRTOgnjen Gajic
METRIC (Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care), Emergency and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Division of Pulmonary Care & Critical Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
MDSonal R Pannu
METRIC (Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care), Emergency and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Division of Pulmonary Care & Critical Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Division of Pulmonary Care & Critical Medicine, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
MDIn this issue
Respiratory Care
Vol. 61, Issue 2
1 Feb 2016
A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Rescue Strategies in 1,000 Subjects With Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Pablo Moreno Franco, Felicity Enders, Gregory Wilson, Ognjen Gajic, Sonal R Pannu
Respiratory Care Feb 2016, 61 (2) 127-133; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04162