Comparison of Interfaces for the Delivery of Noninvasive Respiratory Support to Low Birthweight Infants

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mahmoud RA,
   2. Roehr CC,
   3. Schmalisch G

   . Current methods of non-invasive ventilatory support for neonates. Paediatr Respir Rev 2011;12(3):196–205.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Hjalmarson O,
   2. Sandberg K

   . Abnormal lung function in healthy preterm infants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165(1):83–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lista G,
   2. Castoldi F,
   3. Fontana P,
   4. Reali R,
   5. Reggiani A,
   6. Bianchi S,
   7. Compagnoni G

   . Lung inflammation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006;41(4):357–363.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Deakins KM

   . Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Respir Care 2009;54(9):1252–1262.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Diblasi RM

   . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the respiratory care of the newborn infant. Respir Care 2009;54(9):1209–1235.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Jane Pillow J

   . Which continuous positive airway pressure system is best for the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome? Clin Perinatol 2012;39(3):483–496.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Courtney SE,
   2. Pyon KH,
   3. Saslow JG,
   4. Arnold GK,
   5. Pandit PB,
   6. Habib RH

   . Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics 2001;107(2):304–308.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Klausner JF,
   2. Lee AY,
   3. Hutchison AA

   . Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996;22(3):188–194.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Robertson NJ,
   2. McCarthy LS,
   3. Hamilton PA,
   4. Moss AL

   . Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;75(3):F209–F212.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Fischer C,
    2. Bertelle V,
    3. Hohlfeld J,
    4. Forcada-Guex M,
    5. Stadelmann-Diaw C,
    6. Tolsa JF

    . Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;95(6):F447–F451.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Esquinas AM

    Non-invasive mechanical ventilation and difficult weaning in critical care. Esquinas AM editor. Springer International Publishing; 2016.
12. 12.↵
    1. Newnam KM,
    2. McGrath JM,
    3. Salyer J,
    4. Estes T,
    5. Jallo N,
    6. Bass WT

    . A comparative effectiveness study of continuous positive airway pressure-related skin breakdown when using different nasal interfaces in the extremely low birth weight neonate. Appl Nurs Res 2015;28(1):36–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Mukerji A,
    2. Belik J

    . Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation efficacy and lung pressure transmission. J Perinatol 2015;35(9):716–719.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.
    1. Iyer NP,
    2. Chatburn R

    . Evaluation of a nasal cannula in noninvasive ventilation using a lung simulator. Respir Care 2015;60(4):508–512.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Gerdes JS,
    2. Sivieri EM,
    3. Abbasi S

    . Factors influencing delivered mean airway pressure during nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016;51(1):60–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Nzegwu NI,
    2. Mack T,
    3. DellaVentura R,
    4. Dunphy L,
    5. Koval N,
    6. Levit O,
    7. Bhandari V

    . Systematic use of the RAM nasal cannula in the Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a quality improvement project. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28(6):718–721.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. http://ebooks.aappublications.org/content/guidelines-for-perinatal-care-7th-edition. Accessed January 9, 2018.
18. 18.↵
    Neonatal Resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/126/5/e1400.info. Accessed January 9, 2018.
19. 19.↵
    1. Pfister RH,
    2. Soll RF

    . Initial respiratory support of preterm infants: the role of CPAP, the INSURE method, and noninvasive ventilation. Clin Perinatol 2012;39(3):459–481.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Sarah J. Kilpatrick,
    2. Lu-Ann Papile,
    3. George A. Macones

    AAP Committee on Fetus and Newborn and ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 8th Edition. Edited by Sarah J. Kilpatrick, Lu-Ann Papile, George A. Macones, 2017.
21. 21.
    1. Davidson LM,
    2. Berkelhamer SK

    . Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: chronic lung disease of infancy and long-term pulmonary outcomes. J Clin Med. 2017 [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.3390/jcm6010004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 22.↵
    Vermont Oxford Network. nightingale.vtoxford.org/reports. Accessed June 15, 2017.
23. 23.↵
    1. Paulus F,
    2. Binnekade JM,
    3. Vroom MB,
    4. Schultz MJ

    . Benefits and risks of manual hyperinflation in intubated and mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2012;16(4):R145.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.
    1. Tingay DG,
    2. Copnell B,
    3. Mills JF,
    4. Morley CJ,
    5. Dargaville PA

    . Effects of open endotracheal suction on lung volume in infants receiving HFOV. Intensive Care Med 2007;33(4):689–693.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.
    1. Stenqvist O,
    2. Lindgren S,
    3. Kárason S,
    4. Söndergaard S,
    5. Lundin S

    . Warning! Suctioning. A lung model evaluation of closed suctioning systems. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45(2):167–172.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Dyhr T,
    2. Bonde J,
    3. Larsson A

    . Lung recruitment manoeuvres are effective in regaining lung volume and oxygenation after open endotracheal suctioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2003;7(1):55–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Neumann P,
    2. Berglund JE,
    3. Fernández Mondéjar E,
    4. Magnusson A,
    5. Hedenstierna G

    . Dynamics of lung collapse and recruitment during prolonged breathing in porcine lung injury. J Appl Physiol 1998;85(4):1533–1543.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Halbertsma FJ,
    2. van der Hoeven JG

    . Lung recruitment during mechanical positive pressure ventilation in the PICU: what can be learned from the literature? Anaesthesia 2005;60(8):779–790.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.
    1. Rimensberger PC,
    2. Pache JC,
    3. McKerlie C,
    4. Frndova H,
    5. Cox PN

    . Lung recruitment and lung volume maintenance: a strategy for improving oxygenation and preventing lung injury during both conventional mechanical ventilation and high-frequency oscillation. Intensive Care Med 2000;26(6):745–755.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Avery ME,
    2. Tooley WH,
    3. Keller JB,
    4. Hurd SS,
    5. Bryan MH,
    6. Cotton RB,
    7. et al

    . Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 1987;79(1):26–30.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Booth C,
    2. Premkumar MH,
    3. Yannoulis A,
    4. Thomson M,
    5. Harrison M,
    6. Edwards AD

    . Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91(6):F398–F402.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Barrington KJ,
    2. Bull D,
    3. Finer NN

    . Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pedatrics 2001;107(4):638–641.

    OpenUrl
33. 33.
    1. Ramanathan R,
    2. Sekar KC,
    3. Rasmussen M,
    4. Bhatia J,
    5. Soll RF

    . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol 2012;32(5):336–343.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.
    1. Lemyre B,
    2. Davis PG,
    3. De Paoli AG

    . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002 [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002272.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 35.↵
    1. Khalaf MN,
    2. Brodsky N,
    3. Hurley J,
    4. Bhandari V

    . A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001;108(1):13–17.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Pandit PB,
    2. Courtney SE,
    3. Pyon KH,
    4. Saslow JG,
    5. Habib RH

    . Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001;108(3):682–685.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Ahluwalia JS,
    2. White DK,
    3. Morley CJ

    . Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-term physiological effects. Acta Paediatr 1998;87(3):325–327.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Stefanescu BM,
    2. Murphy WP,
    3. Hansell BJ,
    4. Fuloria M,
    5. Morgan TM,
    6. Aschner JL

    . A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003;112(5):1031–1038.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Brackin VF,
    2. Kiliszewski

    . RAM Cannula Mechanical Flow Data. https://www.neotechproducts.com/n17/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/RAM_Mechanical_Flow_WEB.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2017.
40. 40.↵
    1. do Nascimento RM,
    2. Ferreira AL,
    3. Coutinho AC,
    4. Santos Verissimo RC

    . The frequency of nasal injury in newborns due to the use of continuous positive airway pressure with prongs. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2009;17(4)489–494.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Manley BJ,
    2. Owen LS,
    3. Doyle LW,
    4. Andersen CC,
    5. Cartwright DW,
    6. Pritchard MA,
    7. et al

    . High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med 2013;369(15):1425–1433.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Collins CL,
    2. Holberton JR,
    3. Barfield C,
    4. Davis PG

    . A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr 2013;162(5):949–954.e1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Lim K,
    2. Wheeler KI,
    3. Gale TJ,
    4. Jackson HD,
    5. Kihlstrand JF,
    6. Sand C,
    7. et al

    . Oxygen saturation targeting in preterm infants receiving continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2014;164(4):730–736.e1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed