Baseline Spirometry as a Predictor of Positive Methacholine Challenge Testing for Exertional Dyspnea

References

1. 1.↵
   American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 19992000;161(1):309-329.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Irvin CG

   . Bronchial challenge testing. Respir Care Clin N Am 1995;1(2):265-285.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. O’Donnell AE,
   2. Fling J

   . Exercise-induced airflow obstruction in a healthy military population. Chest 1993;103(3):742-744.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Morris MJ,
   2. Grbach VX,
   3. Deal LE,
   4. Boyd SY,
   5. Johnson JE,
   6. Morgan JA

   . Evaluation of exertional dyspnea in the active duty patient: the diagnostic approach and the utility of clinical testing. Mil Med 2002;167(4):281-288.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Brown LL,
   2. Martin BL,
   3. Morris MJ

   . Airway hyperresponsiveness by methacholine challenge testing following negative exercise challenge. J Asthma 2004;41(5):553-558.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Roth BJ,
   2. Dillard TA,
   3. Hammers LM

   . Methacholine challenge testing in reserve officer training corps cadets. Chest 2001;119(3):701-707.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   Army Regulation 40–501. Standards of Medical Fitness. Washington, District of Columbia: Headquarters, Department of the Army; 22 Dec 2016.
8. 8.↵
   1. O’Connor GT,
   2. Sparrow D,
   3. Weiss ST

   . Normal range of methacholine responsiveness in relation to prechallenge pulmonary function. The normative aging study. Chest 1994;105(3):661-666.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Wassmer G,
   2. Jorres RA,
   3. Heinrich J,
   4. Wjst M,
   5. Reitmeir P,
   6. Wichmann HE

   . The association between baseline lung function and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Eur J Med Res 1997;2(2):47-54.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Jayet PY,
    2. Schindler C,
    3. Künzli N,
    4. Zellweger JP,
    5. Brändli O,
    6. Perruchoud AP,
    7. et al

    ; SAPALDIA team. Reference values for methacholine reactivity (SAPALDIA study). Respir Res 2005;6(1):131-138.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Hewitt DJ

    . Interpretation of the “positive” methacholine challenge. Am J Ind Med 2008;51(10):769-781.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hankinson JL,
    2. Odencrantz JR,
    3. Fedan KB

    . Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(1):179-187.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Westfall PH,
    2. Tobias RD,
    3. Wolfinger RD

    . Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS, 2nd ed. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute; 2011.
14. 14.↵
    1. Alberts WM,
    2. Ferris MC,
    3. Brooks SM,
    4. Goldman AL

    . The FEF_25-75% and the clinical diagnosis of asthma. Ann Allergy 199473(3):221-225.
15. 15.↵
    1. Raji H,
    2. Shoushtari MH,
    3. Idani E,
    4. Tavakol H,
    5. Afrakhteh S,
    6. Dastoorpoor M,
    7. Borsi SH

    . Forced expiratory flow at 25–75% as a marker for airway hyper-responsiveness in adult patients with asthma-like symptoms. Tanaffos 2018;17(2):90-95.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Morris MJ,
    2. Schwartz D,
    3. Nohrenberg JA,
    4. Dooley SN

    . Asymptomatic airway hyper-reactivity in military personnel. Mil Med 2007;172(11):1194-1197.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Nish WA,
    2. Schwietz LA

    . Underdiagnosis of asthma in young adults presenting for USAF basic training. Ann Allergy 1992;69(3):239-242.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Eliasson AH,
    2. Phillips YY,
    3. Rajagopal KR,
    4. Howard RS

    . Sensitivity and specificity of bronchial provocation testing. An evaluation of four techniques in exercise-induced bronchospasm. Chest 1992;102(2):347-355.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Leuallen EC,
    2. Fowler WS

    . Maximal mid-expiratory flow rate. Am Rev Tubercul 1955;72(6):783-790.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Simon MR,
    2. Havstad S,
    3. Cotronei C,
    4. Krell W,
    5. Johnson CC,
    6. Peterson EL

    . Assessment of mid flow rate measurements in patients undergoing methacholine challenge. Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27(4):404-410.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.
    1. Litonjua AA,
    2. Sparrow D,
    3. Weiss ST

    . The FEF_25-75/FVC ratio is associated with methacholine airway responsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(5):1574-1579.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.
    1. Parker AL,
    2. Abu-Hijleh M,
    3. McCool FD

    . Ratio between forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity and FVC is a determinant of airway reactivity and sensitivity to methacholine. Chest 2003;124(1):63-69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Drewek R,
    2. Garber E,
    3. Stanclik S,
    4. Simpson P,
    5. Nugent M,
    6. Gershan W

    . The FEF_25-75 and its decline as a predictor of methacholine responsiveness in children. J Asthma 2009;46(4):375-381.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Malerba M,
    2. Radaeli A,
    3. Olivini A,
    4. Damiani G,
    5. Ragnoli B,
    6. Sorbello V,
    7. Ricciardolo FL

    . Association of FEF_25-75% impairment with bronchial hyper-responsiveness and airway inflammation in subjects with asthma-like symptoms. Respiration 2016;91(3):206-214.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Ciprandi G,
    2. Capasso M,
    3. Tosca M,
    4. Salpietro C,
    5. Salpietro A,
    6. Marseglia G,
    7. La Rosa M

    . A forced expiratory flow at 25–75% value < 65% of predicted should be considered abnormal: a real-world, cross-sectional study. Allergy Asthma Proc 2012;33(1):e5-e8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Ciprandi G,
    2. Tosca MA,
    3. Castellazzi AM,
    4. Cairello F,
    5. Salpietro C,
    6. Arrigo T,
    7. Miraglia Del Giudice M

    . FEF(25-75) might be a predictive factor for bronchial inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity in adolescents with allergic rhinitis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011;24(4 Suppl):17-20.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Riley CM,
    2. Wenzel SE,
    3. Castro M,
    4. Erzurum SC,
    5. Chung KF,
    6. Fitzpatrick AM,
    7. et al

    . Clinical implications of having reduced mid forced expiratory flow rates (FEF_25-75), independently of FEV₁, in adult patients with asthma. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0145476.

    OpenUrlPubMed