Exploring the Impact of Varied Design Approaches and Materials in Respiratory Therapy Education

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Arráez-Aybar L-A,
   2. Sánchez-Montesinos I,
   3. Mirapeix R-M,
   4. Mompeo-Corredera B,
   5. Sañudo-Tejero J-R

   . Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Ann Anat 2010;192(6):341-348.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Schubert C,
   2. van Langeveld MC,
   3. Donoso LA

   . Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98(2):159-161.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Garcia J,
   2. Yang Z,
   3. Mongrain R,
   4. Leask RL,
   5. Lachapelle K

   . 3D-printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2018;4(1):27-40.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Biglino G,
   2. Capelli C,
   3. Koniordou D,
   4. Robertshaw D,
   5. Leaver LK,
   6. Schievano S,
   7. et al

   . Use of 3D models of congenital heart disease as an education tool for cardiac nurses. Congenit Heart Dis 2017;12(1):113-118.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Youman S,
   2. Dang E,
   3. Jones M,
   4. Duran D,
   5. Brenseke B

   . The use of 3D printers in medical education with a focus on bone pathology. Med Sci Educ 2021;31(2):581-588.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Liu WL,
   2. Lee IH,
   3. Lee LN,
   4. Yang SH,
   5. Chao KY

   . A 3D-printed high-fidelity bronchial tree for bronchoscopy. Respir Care 2023;68(4):527-530.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. West AJ,
   2. Parchoma G

   . The practice of simulation-based assessment in respiratory therapy education. Can J Respir Ther 2017;53(1):13-16.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Barry Issenberg S,
   2. McGaghie WC,
   3. Petrusa ER,
   4. Lee Gordon D,
   5. Scalese RJ

   . Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27(1):10-28.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Wisborg T,
   2. Brattebø G,
   3. Brinchmann-Hansen Å,
   4. Hansen KS

   . Mannequin or standardized patient: participants’ assessment of 2 training modalities in trauma team simulation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009;17(1):59.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Yuen J

    . What is the role of 3D printing in undergraduate anatomy education? A scoping review of current literature and recommendations. Med Sci Educ 2020;30(3):1321-1329.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ellis H

    . Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin Anat 2001;14(2):149-151.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Memon I

    . Cadaver dissection is obsolete in medical training! A misinterpreted notion. Med Princ Pract 2018;27(3):201-210.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Martin-Ruiz S,
    2. Gutierrez-Collar C,
    3. Forcen Vicente De Vera E,
    4. Bernabe-Barrios MJ,
    5. de Blas CS,
    6. Konschake M,
    7. et al

    . The bronchial segmentation and its anatomical variations. A clinical-anatomic and bronchoscopy study. Ann Anat 2021;235:151677.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ye Z,
    2. Jiang H,
    3. Bai S,
    4. Wang T,
    5. Yang D,
    6. Hou H,
    7. et al

    . Meta-analyzing the efficacy of 3D-printed models in anatomy education. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11:1117555.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Seifert LB,
    2. Schnurr B,
    3. Herrera-Vizcaino C,
    4. Begic A,
    5. Thieringer F,
    6. Schwarz F,
    7. et al

    . 3D-printed patient individualized models vs cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: comparison of student’s perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ 2020;24(4):799-806.

    OpenUrlPubMed