Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post–hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post–hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.
RESULTS: The subjects (N = 43) were mainly male, middle age, and overweight. Subjects who were invasively ventilated (n = 21) had decreased physical function compared to those who were not during hospital assessments. From 3–6 months after discharge, all WHODAS domains and the overall score decreased in both groups (P < .001), indicating disability recovery. The participation domain, which assesses joining in society, was the only domain that remained worse in the ventilation group compared to the no ventilation group (P = .01). No interaction was found between time and the study groups, suggesting that the recovery trajectory was similar. At 6 months, considering the entire cohort, 70% and 56% had no disability in self-care and getting along domains, respectively, while 42% exhibited moderate to severe disability in the participation domain. According to the overall WHODAS score, 86% of subjects still had some level of disability at 6 months. In multivariate analyses, the overall WHODAS score along with the household and participation domains showed significant positive correlations, indicating higher disability, with corticosteroid use.
CONCLUSIONS: Disability persisted at 6 month post–hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.
- intensive care
- disability
- post–COVID-19 condition
- mechanical ventilation
- long-term outcomes
Footnotes
- Correspondence: Marcia S Volpe PhD PT, Departamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Silva Jardim, 136, Santos, São Paulo, Brasil, CEP: 11015–020. E-mail: marcia.volpe{at}unifesp.br
The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
See the Related Editorial on Page 1614
- Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.