Helmet Versus Nasal-Prong CPAP in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ralston SL,
   2. Lieberthal AS,
   3. Meissner HC,
   4. Alverson BK,
   5. Baley JE,
   6. Gadomski AM,
   7. et al

   . Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2014;134(5):e1474–e1502.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Thia LP,
   2. McKenzie SA,
   3. Blyth TP,
   4. Minasian CC,
   5. Kozlowska WJ,
   6. Carr SB

   . Randomised controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) in bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 2008;93(1):45–47.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Cambonie G,
   2. Milesi C,
   3. Jaber S,
   4. Amsallem F,
   5. Barbotte E,
   6. Picaud JC,
   7. Matecki S

   . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure decreases respiratory muscles overload in young infants with severe acute viral bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(10):1865–1872.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Milesi C,
   2. Matecki S,
   3. Jaber S,
   4. Mura T,
   5. Jacquot A,
   6. Pidoux O,
   7. et al

   . 6 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional oxygen therapy in severe viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013;48(1):45–51.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Buettiker V,
   2. Hug MI,
   3. Baenziger O,
   4. Meyer C,
   5. Frey B

   . Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns. Intensive Care Med 2004;30(5):926–930.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. De Paoli AG,
   2. Davis PG,
   3. Faber B,
   4. Morley CJ

   . Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(1):CD002977.
7. 7.↵
   1. Chidini G,
   2. Calderini E,
   3. Cesana BM,
   4. Gandini C,
   5. Prandi E,
   6. Pelosi P

   . Noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in acute respiratory failure: helmet versus facial mask. Pediatrics 2010;126(2):e330–e336.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Chidini G,
   2. Calderini E,
   3. Pelosi P

   . Treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a new pediatric helmet in comparison with a standard full face mask: a prospective pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010;11(4):502–508.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Chidini G,
   2. Piastra M,
   3. Marchesi T,
   4. De Luca D,
   5. Napolitano L,
   6. Salvo I,
   7. et al

   . Continuous positive airway pressure with helmet versus mask in infants with bronchiolitis: an RCT. Pediatrics 2015;135(4):e868–e875.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.
    1. Codazzi D,
    2. Nacoti M,
    3. Passoni M,
    4. Bonanomi E,
    5. Sperti LR,
    6. Fumagalli R

    . Continuous positive airway pressure with modified helmet for treatment of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure in infants and a preschool population: a feasibility study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7(5):455–460.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Milesi C,
    2. Ferragu F,
    3. Jaber S,
    4. Rideau A,
    5. Combes C,
    6. Matecki S,
    7. et al

    . Continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with helmet in infants under 1 year. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(9):1592–1596.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Vitaliti G,
    2. Vitaliti MC,
    3. Finocchiaro MC,
    4. Di Stefano VA,
    5. Pavone P,
    6. Matin N,
    7. et al

    . Randomized comparison of helmet CPAP versus high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in pediatric respiratory distress. Respir Care 2017;62(8):1036–1042.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Trevisanuto D,
    2. Grazzina N,
    3. Doglioni N,
    4. Ferrarese P,
    5. Marzari F,
    6. Zanardo V

    . A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with a standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system. Intensive Care Med 2005;31(6):859–864.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Mayordomo-Colunga J,
    2. Medina A,
    3. Rey C,
    4. Concha A,
    5. Los Arcos M,
    6. Menéndez S

    . Helmet-delivered continuous positive airway pressure with heliox in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr 2010;99(2):308–311.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Mayordomo-Colunga J,
    2. Medina A,
    3. Rey C,
    4. Los Arcos M,
    5. Concha A,
    6. Menéndez S

    . [Success and failure predictors of non-invasive ventilation in acute bronchiolitis]. An Pediatr (Barc) 2009;70(1):34–39.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Martinon-Torres F,
    2. Rodriguez-Nunez A,
    3. Martinon-Sanchez JM

    . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure with heliox versus air oxygen in infants with acute bronchiolitis: a crossover study. Pediatrics 2008;121(5):e1190–e1195.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Soong WJ,
    2. Hwang B,
    3. Tang RB

    . Continuous positive airway pressure by nasal prongs in bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1993;16(3):163–166.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Martinon-Torres F,
    2. Rodriguez-Nunez A,
    3. Martinon-Sanchez JM

    . Heliox therapy in infants with acute bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2002;109(1):68–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Patroniti N,
    2. Foti G,
    3. Manfio A,
    4. Coppo A,
    5. Bellani G,
    6. Pesenti A

    . Head helmet versus face mask for non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure: a physiological study. Intensive Care Med 2003;29(10):1680–1687.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Grizzle JE

    . The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 1965;21:467–480.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Mayordomo-Colunga J,
    2. Medina A,
    3. Rey C,
    4. Díaz JJ,
    5. Concha A,
    6. Los Arcos M,
    7. Menéndez S

    . Predictive factors of non invasive ventilation failure in critically ill children: a prospective epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35(3):527–536.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Essouri S,
    2. Laurent M,
    3. Chevret L,
    4. Durand P,
    5. Ecochard E,
    6. Gajdos V,
    7. et al

    . Improved clinical and economic outcomes in severe bronchiolitis with pre-emptive nCPAP ventilatory strategy. Intensive Care Med 2014;40(1):84–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Ganu SS,
    2. Gautam A,
    3. Wilkins B,
    4. Egan J

    . Increase in use of non-invasive ventilation for infants with severe bronchiolitis is associated with decline in intubation rates over a decade. Intensive Care Med 2012;38(7):1177–1183.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Javouhey E,
    2. Barats A,
    3. Richard N,
    4. Stamm D,
    5. Floret D

    . Non-invasive ventilation as primary ventilatory support for infants with severe bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(9):1608–1614.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Essouri S,
    2. Durand P,
    3. Chevret L,
    4. Balu L,
    5. Devictor D,
    6. Fauroux B,
    7. Tissières P

    . Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med 2011;37(12):2002–2007.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Mansbach JM,
    2. Piedra PA,
    3. Stevenson MD,
    4. Sullivan AF,
    5. Forgey TF,
    6. Clark S,
    7. et al

    . Prospective multicenter study of children with bronchiolitis requiring mechanical ventilation. Pediatrics 2012;130(3):e492–e500.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Baudin F,
    2. Pouyau R,
    3. Cour-Andlauer F,
    4. Berthiller J,
    5. Robert D,
    6. Javouhey E

    . Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) reduces asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for severe bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015;50(12):1320–1327.

    OpenUrl
28. 28.↵
    1. Conti G,
    2. Gregoretti C,
    3. Spinazzola G,
    4. Festa O,
    5. Ferrone G,
    6. Cipriani F,
    7. et al

    . Influence of different interfaces on synchrony during pressure support ventilation in a pediatric setting: a bench study. Respir Care 2015;60(4):498–507.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Costa R,
    2. Navalesi P,
    3. Spinazzola G,
    4. Ferrone G,
    5. Pellegrini A,
    6. Cavaliere F,
    7. et al

    . Influence of ventilator settings on patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation with different interfaces. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(8):1363–1370.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.
    1. Isgro S,
    2. Zanella A,
    3. Sala C,
    4. Grasselli G,
    5. Foti G,
    6. Pesenti A,
    7. Patroniti N

    . Continuous flow biphasic positive airway pressure by helmet in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure: effect on oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(10):1688–1694.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.
    1. Olivieri C,
    2. Longhini F,
    3. Cena T,
    4. Cammarota G,
    5. Vaschetto R,
    6. Messina A,
    7. et al

    . New versus conventional helmet for delivering noninvasive ventilation: a physiologic, crossover randomized study in critically ill patients. Anesthesiology 2016;124(1):101–108.

    OpenUrl
32. 32.↵
    1. Patel BK,
    2. Wolfe KS,
    3. Pohlman AS,
    4. Hall JB,
    5. Kress JP

    . Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315(22):2435–2441.

    OpenUrl
33. 33.
    1. Piastra M,
    2. De Luca D,
    3. Pietrini D,
    4. Pulitanò S,
    5. D'Arrigo S,
    6. Mancino A,
    7. Conti G

    . Noninvasive pressure-support ventilation in immunocompromised children with ARDS: a feasibility study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35(8):1420–1427.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Vargas F,
    2. Thille A,
    3. Lyazidi A,
    4. Campo FR,
    5. Brochard L

    . Helmet with specific settings versus facemask for noninvasive ventilation. Crit Care Med 2009;37(6):1921–1928.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Zaramella P,
    2. Freato F,
    3. Grazzina N,
    4. Saraceni E,
    5. Vianello A,
    6. Chiandetti L

    . Does helmet CPAP reduce cerebral blood flow and volume by comparison with infant flow driver CPAP in preterm neonates? Intensive Care Med 2006;32(10):1613–1619.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Rocco M,
    2. Dell'Utri D,
    3. Morelli A,
    4. Spadetta G,
    5. Conti G,
    6. Antonelli M,
    7. Pietropaoli P

    . Noninvasive ventilation by helmet or face mask in immunocompromised patients: a case-control study. Chest 2004;126(5):1508–1515.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Essouri S,
    2. Nicot F,
    3. Clement A,
    4. Garabedian EN,
    5. Roger G,
    6. Lofaso F,
    7. Fauroux B

    . Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in infants with upper airway obstruction: comparison of continuous and bilevel positive pressure. Intensive Care Med 2005;31(4):574–580.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Chiumello D,
    2. Chierichetti M,
    3. Tallarini F,
    4. Cozzi P,
    5. Cressoni M,
    6. Polli F,
    7. et al

    . Effect of a heated humidifier during continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a helmet. Crit Care 2008;12(2):R55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Nava S,
    2. Navalesi P,
    3. Gregoretti C

    . Interfaces and humidification for noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2009;54(1):71–84.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Mojoli F,
    2. Iotti GA,
    3. Gerletti M,
    4. Lucarini C,
    5. Braschi A

    . Carbon dioxide rebreathing during non-invasive ventilation delivered by helmet: a bench study. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(8):1454–1460.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Fodil R,
    2. Lellouche F,
    3. Mancebo J,
    4. Sbirlea-Apiou G,
    5. Isabey D,
    6. Brochard L,
    7. Louis B

    . Comparison of patient-ventilator interfaces based on their computerized effective dead space. Intensive Care Med 2011;37(2):257–262.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science