This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is most frequently delivered to mechanically ventilated patients in critical care, but it can also be administered noninvasively. The delivered dose and efficiency of continuous flow NO supplied through a nasal cannula has yet to be established. This study aimed to determine the influence of nasal cannula type, supply flow, and breathing pattern on delivered NO using a realistic adult airway replica and lung simulator.
METHODS: Simulated breathing patterns were selected to represent rest, sleep, and light exercise, and were varied to investigate the effects of tidal volume and breathing frequency independently. Supplied gas flows targeted tracheal concentrations at rest of 5 or 20 ppm NO and were supplied with 2 L/min O2. Three different cannulas were tested. Tracheal NO concentrations and NO mass flow past the trachea were evaluated.
RESULTS: Cannula type had a minor influence on delivered dose. Tracheal NO concentrations differed significantly based on breathing pattern (P < 0.01); for a target NO concentration of 20 ppm at rest, average inhaled NO concentrations were 23.3 ± 0.5 ppm, 36.5 ± 1.4 ppm, and 17.2 ± 0.3 ppm for the rest, sleep, and light exercise breathing patterns, respectively. For the same test conditions, mass flow of NO past the trachea was less sensitive to breathing pattern: 20.3 ± 0.5 mg/h, 19.9 ± 0.8 mg/h, and 24.3 ± 0.4 mg/h for the rest, sleep, and light exercise breathing patterns, respectively. Mass flow and delivery efficiency increased when minute volume increased.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that inhaled NO concentration is strongly influenced by breathing pattern, whereas inhaled NO mass flow is not. NO mass flow may therefore be a useful dose metric for continuous flow delivery via nasal cannula.
- inhaled nitric oxide
- constant flow
- airway model
- nasal cannula
- tracheal concentration
- mass flow
- dose
- efficiency
Footnotes
- Correspondence: Andrew R Martin PhD PEng, 10–324, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada. E-mail: andrew.martin{at}ualberta.ca
The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Ms Pillay presented a version of this paper at the Alberta Biomedical Engineering Conference, held October 25–27, 2019, in Banff, Alberta.
- Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
Log in using your username and password
